<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too much Javascript?  Here comes WebKit and the new Safari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari</link>
	<description>Web development and design blog from Portland based developer Jon Raasch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Raasch</title>
		<link>http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari/comment-page-1#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Raasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Hey Bill,

The new webkit stuff is actually available in Safari 4 which is currently in beta: http://www.apple.com/safari/

Thanks for reading!
-jr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bill,</p>
<p>The new webkit stuff is actually available in Safari 4 which is currently in beta: <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/safari/</a></p>
<p>Thanks for reading!<br />
-jr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari/comment-page-1#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Is there a trial review?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a trial review?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Raasch</title>
		<link>http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Raasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Gagarine,

I think you misunderstood some of what I wrote here.  First, I never said Flash was SEO friendly (in fact I imply the opposite).  Second, when I said Javascript was not SEO friendly, I was talking about content loaded by Javascript.  As I mentioned, the HTML coupled with the Javascript is completely trackable.  Therefore unobtrusive javascript is obviously fine, as well as the less obtrusive Flash I am discussing here.

You sound like a good JS programmer, I&#039;m sure you know that most of the Javascript on the internet is pretty wack.  Don&#039;t take this article as an attack on your code, I was talking about MOST javascript.

I don&#039;t know much about cross platform issues with the Flash player, but that&#039;s interesting.  I&#039;m still a Flash/AS noob.

Thanks for reading,
jr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gagarine,</p>
<p>I think you misunderstood some of what I wrote here.  First, I never said Flash was SEO friendly (in fact I imply the opposite).  Second, when I said Javascript was not SEO friendly, I was talking about content loaded by Javascript.  As I mentioned, the HTML coupled with the Javascript is completely trackable.  Therefore unobtrusive javascript is obviously fine, as well as the less obtrusive Flash I am discussing here.</p>
<p>You sound like a good JS programmer, I&#8217;m sure you know that most of the Javascript on the internet is pretty wack.  Don&#8217;t take this article as an attack on your code, I was talking about MOST javascript.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about cross platform issues with the Flash player, but that&#8217;s interesting.  I&#8217;m still a Flash/AS noob.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading,<br />
jr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gagarine</title>
		<link>http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>gagarine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonraasch.com/blog/too-much-javascript-here-comes-webkit-and-the-new-safari#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Flash player is bugy on mac and linux.

AS3 have better performance but is NOT a standard. So you can&#039;t make you own flash player. 

And please remember that flash is not SEO-friendly.

If you are a good JS programmer your js is not intrusive so it&#039;s completly SEO-friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash player is bugy on mac and linux.</p>
<p>AS3 have better performance but is NOT a standard. So you can&#8217;t make you own flash player. </p>
<p>And please remember that flash is not SEO-friendly.</p>
<p>If you are a good JS programmer your js is not intrusive so it&#8217;s completly SEO-friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
